The third quarter of 2026 was a remarkably average one for the market, as the S&P 500 advanced 2.30%, very much in line with oft-cited rates of return for the asset class. The final day of the quarter saw the index close just 1.89% below its prior all-time high from approximately halfway through the quarter. Underneath the hood, though, the past quarter’s poor breadth was particularly notable for an index hitting all-time highs: four stocks – Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA and Meta – generated 4.23% for the index, or nearly twice the entire index’s gain, while the remaining 496 stocks collectively lost -1.92%. By the end of the quarter, 83% of the index was at least 10% below their 52-week highs, while over 200 of the 500 constituents were at least 20% below their 52-week highs. The broad-based weakness was particularly noticeable in smaller capitalization stocks, with the Russell 2000 losing -7.19% in the quarter. Pundits attributed the declines to a combination of reduced growth expectations, spiking energy prices and the concurrent rise in interest rates.
With the ten-year US note yield starting the quarter at 4.47% and ending it at 5.28%, one of the charts making the rounds on social media lately shows that the correlation between stocks and rates has often flipped once rates reach 5%. The chart’s “obvious” implication is that note yields moving above 5% start to produce a headwind for stocks and could weigh on the market. However, the short-sighted focus on correlations and relative price movements misses a more important point – namely, that the highest interest rates we have seen in decades likely imply higher rates of return for patient bond and equity investors than the myopic rate worrywarts might be expecting. Research from Birinyi looked at all 12-month periods since 1985 after a spike of 1.00% in the ten-year yield over 3 to 7 months and found the S&P 500 to be higher in 9 of the 11 previous instances, with an average return of 11.7%.
Birinyi’s findings notwithstanding, it is understandable to look at the stock market, which is up 15.6x over 17.5 years between the global financial crisis low and last quarter-end, and to question when it might all come to an end. The right answer sits in the common Wall Street adage that “bull markets don’t die of old age.” More specifically, famous financial lore attributed to John Templeton notes that, “Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria.”
With the exception of AI capex and some big growth names, there are little signs of euphoria out there right now and lots of compelling valuations following the small-cap pullback. Indeed, many of AI’s supposed victims are exhibiting valuations that fall squarely into the “pessimism” bucket, if not worse. We bought shares of a business process outsourcing company in Q3, Concentrix (CNXC), which is still growing and trades at just over 2x earnings at quarter end, and it has strong potential for margin improvement along with an AI unit that has a growing backlog. If the market valued the company at 3x earnings rather than approximately 2x, that would imply a roughly 50% higher share price, assuming unchanged earnings per share.1
Concentrix is just one example of the pessimism we still see in valuations. The reality is that misperceptions of the implications of hot themes in public markets mean opportunity, not risk. It is a great environment for capital, with more compelling options today than have existed in quite some time. For those who prioritize stability of principal in their portfolios, bonds have rarely offered as compelling risk-adjusted return potential as they do today, despite another past quarter of losses. Five years ago, as responses to COVID shut down the global economy, the market could not get enough safety, driving five-year TIPS yields down to -1.99%, the quintessential example of return-free risk. At the end of the third quarter after years of paltry returns, hold-to-maturity US TIPS investors could lock in a guaranteed real rate of return of 2.70% over five years, a level not seen since the global financial crisis. Financial theory would suggest that the marginal volatility of equities could imply an even better result if managers play their cards right, and we are excited about the prospective returns of our strategies.
As always, we remain the largest investors in our strategies and appreciate your partnership.
Bill Miller IV, CFA, CMT
October 15, 2026
@billfour